The Keifuku Randen line is an old tram line, actually, the only tram line left in Kyoto. It is an interesting option if you’re visiting Kyoto as it stops close by a number of shrines and temples.
Not entirely sure which station this is, it’s based on a reference from a while back, but I believe it was Arashiyama.
A thatched roof tea-house in Nara, named Mizutani-chaya. Situated near to Nara park and the famous Kasuga Taisha shrine. The watercolour version was made in a small Bockingford spiral pad, 5″ x 7″. Not sure how I feel about this, the values are wrong, they don’t quite make logical sense and there is a weird “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” vibe to it! I really need to be practising a lot more than I am.
Line sketch in ink prior to adding the watercolour.
Initial pencil sketch – proportions were a little off here but I fixed that in the line and wash sketch.
These are from a trip a while back to the areas of Gokayama-go and Shirakawa-go. They are a UNESCO world heritage site famous for their traditional architecture, the steep-sided thatched gassho-zukuri houses.
For these sketches, however, instead of the houses I concentrated on a shrine in Gokayama.
I also tried using a paper which I purchased recently and had never used before, Bee Paper, advertised as a 100% cotton watercolour paper. I bought the paper after watching Teoh Yi Chie’s review. Having used it now, my impression of it is that it is useful for practice pieces but nothing more than that.
In the first sketch, I applied masking fluid, on the torii, only too late realising that I hadn’t tested the paper to see whether it would handle masking fluid well. It doesn’t! Some of the masking fluid pulled off the paper surface with it. And then I went and repeated exactly the same mistake on the second sketch, thinking that the first time it happened was just because I had left the masking fluid on too long!
Another thing I noticed was that the paint seemed to behave oddly or at least not in ways that I am used to. After applying a wash for instance the paper seemed to take an inordinately long time to dry.
And then there’s the surface texture. The paper is cold-pressed so it has a slight texture to it but the texture has a regular, uniform, machine-like appearance to it which seems less than ideal.
So, all-in-all, not terribly impressed with the paper but I’ll continue to use it for practice and testing ideas.
So, the sketches turned out sort of okay. Not exactly what I was looking for, but I think this is a scene that I will return to again.
This is the first version; you can probably see the marks on the paper where I tore the surface when taking off the masking fluid!
This is my initial, quick pencil sketch of the scene.
I like drawing apples. They seem to be a subject that can be both very easy to draw but one that can also be quite challenging if you want it to be. For the two watercolour sketches, I set the bar quite low and was simply hoping to render something that was more or less recognisable as an apple.
A few more tree studies – principally silhouettes. These are drawn from photos I took a few months ago in the local woodland. My interest here was, mainly depicting the structure of the trees but also using the different media, pencil vs Pentel brush pen vs Pigma Micron.
Repeated the same exercise but using a Pentel brush pen – not really finished – but no inclination to take it further.
A simple sketch of a tree in a local woodland area; not entirely sure what kind of tree it is although I should really take the time to find out.